I
've been writing my technical blog -devoted to web programming and technology (in spanish)- since may of 2004, so almost for 5 years now. I also do cross-posting to Geeks.ms, the biggest Spanish-spoken community related to Microsoft Technology. Before the blogging era I ran several other technical web pages. I humbly consider that my content is generally of good quality, and I get a lot of visitors and a lot of comments. I spend many hours each year collating valuable knowledge for everyone to read for free. I've been doing this for almost 12 years now. And my pay for this is precisely zero, nothing, nada.
I do this just for the sake of it, not for making money out of it. I even use my own blog as a repository of knowledge for a lot of things I learn and that otherwise would get lost (every day I'm able to remember fewer and fewer things due to information overload). So, economically, I didn't expect anything in return for my work.
However, a couple of years ago I decided to include a little bit of advertising in the blog. Very few non-intrusive ads and, thanks to the magic of Google Adsense, most of the time content-related. So I hope that even the ads would interest my visitors. It was most of all a marketing experiment. I wanted to know how the ads would work in a niche blog like mine, and if they would influence the number of visitors and the perceived quality of the blog.
It was quite disappointing to see that very, very, very few people click on ads, even the people who find the contents interesting or even tell me that "You saved my life with this trick", "I was going mad with this problem and your solution works like a charm", etc... In Spanish-speaking countries the click-rate is much lower than those on the US or Anglo-Saxon countries.
I have thought a lot about the advertising in pages with free content. I have always intuitively understood that clicking on ads is a way to thank the people who have help me for free. A lot of pages and portals that offer great content depend on ad revenue to survive, so when one of them gives me good value (such a good advice or a game or a great free download and so on) I try to click on one ad to say thank you.
There are people who are proud of not clicking on ads, and who even install programs that automatically remove advertising from their browsers.
But if you don't click on ads the whole idea of free content on the Internet automatically vanished. So I think that clicking on ads that interest you is a good way to achieve two main objectives:
1. Say thank you to the people who bring great content to you and help to ensure continuity of that good work
2. You get access to products or services that maybe can interest you or be of value to you.
I stick by a couple of watchwords, however:
1. I only click on ads that could interest me, so there is a legitimate interest in the click too.
2. The portal I visit must show legitimate, targeted advertising, not generic banners about things unrelated to the subject of the page.
I think it's a win-win situation for everyone. The content owners get rewarded for their good work, the advertiser gets a prospective customer on their site and you get information about something that maybe is going to interest you.
The reality is that almost no one cares to think about this kind of things, and that not a lot of people click on ads. The percentage is high enough for Google and other aggregators because the traffic they get is so huge, but is hardly enough for a regular website to make a living. And it's a pity.
It's OK for me and my blog (although a little bit of extra money for my work would be great), but if the site is a commercial one this is absolutely necessary for them.
Googling a little bit about this subject to know what people think about this approach led me today to Seth Godin's blog. He wrote a few months ago a short text about this, expressing the same idea that I intuitively have. And he got a lot of criticism from almost everyone saying that this idea perverts the advertising business. And he is a world-class guru in e-marketing, so I guess that I will be crunched for having written this ;-)
Anyway, I think that the idea is absolutely legitimate and that is a real win-win situation for everyone. And I like the fact that someone like Seth thinks like me :)
I just want to share my thoughts about this with you.
Cheers!